|
Fact Sheet
Investigative Activities
November 2003

Proposed Site
Restoration Activities at Building 4343 to Facilitate Clean Close
Out
Introduction
This fact sheet describes the
selected action for cadmium-contaminated soil at Building 4343 –
Former Cadmium Plating Facility at Radford Army Ammunition Plant (RFAAP).
This alternative was selected in accordance with the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA), the Hazardous and
Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 (HSWA), the RFAAP Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Permit requirements (USEPA,
2000) (EPA ID No. VA1210020730), and the Final RCRA Corrective
Action Plan (USEPA, 1994), as applicable.
Background
The Building 4343 parcel is located
in the west central portion of the Horseshoe Area and was
established in 1956. Cadmium plating activities were conducted at
Building 4343 in support of the NIKE missile program. Treated
process water was discharged to an unlined ditch north of the site.
The RFAAP RCRA Corrective Action Permit, signed in September 2000,
identified Building 4343 as an Area of Concern (AOC) that had the
potential to pose a threat, or potential threat, to human health and
the environment. The Permit required that a sampling strategy be
developed to complete the delineation and characterization of the
site. RCRA Facility Investigation (RFI) field efforts were conducted
in 1999 and 2002. Data indicated that metals (mainly cadmium) had
contaminated soil around Building 4343 and in the process water
discharge ditch and alluvial fan. The contamination was mostly
confined to the top two feet of soil. Two sumps, related to Building
4343, were identified as having elevated concentrations of metals.
Since one of these sumps was located inside Building 4343 there is
the potential for contaminated soil underneath the building. Human
Health and Screening Level Ecological risk assessments indicated
there was elevated risk at the site and remedial measures were
necessary to ensure the protection of human health and the
environment.
Remedial Alternatives
Based on the findings of the Building
4343 RFI, a Corrective Measures Study (CMS) was conducted. The CMS
evaluated remedial alternatives to address the cadmium contamination
at the site. Four corrective measures alternatives were evaluated to
address cadmium in soil at Building 4343:
- No Further Action;
- Excavation of Soil with Waste in
Place, Off-site Disposal, Removal of Sumps, Removal of Building
4343, and Land Use Controls;
- Excavation of Soil for Clean Close
Out, Off-site Disposal, Removal of Sumps, and Removal of
Building 4343; and,
- Stabilization, Removal of Sumps,
Removal of Building 4343, and Land Use Controls.
These four alternatives were
evaluated using the selection criteria: effectiveness,
implementability, and cost. The corrective measures objective (CMO)
for the RFI/CMS was to reduce contaminant concentrations in soil to
allow clean close out of the site. To fully address this objective,
a remedy that addressed the potential for future groundwater impact
received preferential consideration. RFAAP is underlain by karst
geology. The preferential remedial alternative in this type of
geological setting is source removal. Allowing waste to remain in
place above actionable regulatory levels represents a risk to RFAAP
and the Army.
Alternative Three was selected as the
final alternative for Building 4343 because it is implementable and
provides a greater level of protection to human health and the
environment not provided by Alternatives Two and Four. Alternative
Three facilitates clean close out, is cost effective, and is
protective of groundwater. By achieving clean close out, these
corrective measures accomplish the Army’s IRP goal by cleaning up
the site and restoring it for beneficial use.
This alternative includes the
following:
- Delineation of soil containing
cadmium above the Residential Remedial Goal (RG);
- Excavation of the delineated area
such that the remaining soil is below the Residential RG;
- Removal of the sumps (2) where
elevated metals have been identified;
- Removal of Building 4343;
- Transporation and off-site
disposal of soil, sump material, and building debris; and,
- Site restoration activities.
Implementation of this alternative
will reduce the concentrations of cadmium to below the Residential
RG and facilitate clean close out. In addition, the proposed human
health RG for residential land use is expected to result in
reduction of ecological risks associated with chemicals in the soil
to levels that are protective of the environment. Therefore,
implementation of this alternative meets the corrective action
objective and is protective of human health and the environment.
The data, findings, assessments and
recommendations are contained in the Building 4343 RFI/CMS Report,
October 2003 and is being reviewed by the U.S. Army Environmental
Center (USAEC), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Region
III and Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (VDEQ). The
U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine has
concurred with the findings of this report. A copy of this document
is located in the RFAAP information repository.
Conclusion
The selected remedy - Excavation
of Soil for Clean Close Out, Off-site Disposal, Removal of Sumps,
and Removal of Building 4343 – was chosen because it is
considered implementable and provides protection to human health and
the environment. In addition, this alternative facilitates clean
close out and is cost effective. By achieving clean close out, these
corrective measures accomplish the Army’s Installation Restoration
Program (IRP) goal by cleaning up the site and restoring it for
beneficial use. This remedy has been selected by RFAAP in the
Building 4343 RFI/CMS Report, October 2003. The U.S. Army Center for
Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine has concurred with the
findings of this report. This report is under review by the U.S.
Army Environmental Center (USAEC), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (USEPA) Region III and Virginia Department of Environmental
Quality (VDEQ). A copy of the Building 4343 RFI/CMS Report, October
2003 is located in the RFAAP information repository.
|